What are cookies?
Cookies are small pieces of information that are stored on your hard drive to allow the British Institute of International and Comparative Law to recognise you when you visit. They can remember your preferences by gathering and storing information. They do not identify you as an individual user, just the computer used. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or create viruses on your computer. Cookies do not give the British Institute of International and Comparative Law access to your computer.
What types of essential cookies does BIICL use?
We may use cookies to store information about your membership on our site, or to enable you to log in to online resources. This might include registering for our events, making online purchases or accessing member-only content. The information is stored, as cookies, to enable you to use these resources, and to remember your log in details between sessions. If you clear your cookies, you may need to login to these parts of the website each time you visit.
We also use some third party cookies to help us improve your user experience.
If you don't want to receive cookies.
If you would prefer not to receive cookies while browsing our site, you can set your browser so that it will not download cookies onto your computer. Doing so will still allow you to navigate through the majority of our site but possibly not all of it. If you wish to access the password protected areas of our website you will need to allow "per-session" cookies. These are temporarily used while you are visiting the site but deleted when you close your browser or log out.
Rule of Law Conditionalities in the EU – from the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) to the new monitoring mechanisms in the European Union
Mat Tromme
On 31 October 2019, the Bingham Centre, in collaboration with the Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), RECONNECT (2020), and the Romanian Centre for European Policies (CRPE), co-organized a panel during the annual Future of Europe International Conference in Bucharest. The panel mainly focussed on Rule of Law conditionalities and the future of RoL in Eastern Europe.
This comment piece was prepared by Clara Volintiru, Associate Professor at the Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE), who also chaired the panel.
In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), Rule of Law (RoL) has become one of the most politically charged topics. With growth and economic development seemingly stalling in the region, questions abound about the most suitable instruments to strengthen RoL across Europe.
RoL is a fundamental good governance principle which all Member States must comply with and endorse, and which also touches national sovereignty. This, in turn, raises an important question: where should the line be drawn between domestic and European issues when it comes to RoL implementation? Many of the CEE Member States that found themselves chided by the EU for RoL abuses—most notably Poland and Hungary — have challenged the authority of the EU to interfere in what they deem to be domestic political issues.
However, recent developments on the side of the European Commission point to the fact that there is no domestic space of interpretation when it comes to the RoL. Indeed, the Rule of Law, integrity, and anti-corruption compliance are all key European values, as mentioned in the European Commission Communication in July.
There are, however, domestic challenges that affect how the RoL is essentially implemented in practice. Romania and Bulgaria have been struggling to contain corruption and organised crime. As a result, upon accession by both countries to the EU, the Commission introduced a 'Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM)' to monitor implementation of the RoL in these countries. Both of these countries have repeatedly pleaded for a lift of the CVM mechanism. More recently, broader backsliding on the quality of democracy and the justice system have led to the launch of the Art. 7 procedures against Hungary and Poland, which means that the EU can suspend certain rights of a member state that has been identified as persistently breaching the EU's founding values.
So, even if RoL sits at the heart of the European project, the way these values are attacked and undermined can vary from case to case. In some countries, it is the poor institutionalisation of the administrative system that gives way to corrupt practices, in others it is the efficient politicisation of a centralised apparatus that erodes the necessary checks and balances. Also, the same institutional arrangements —which are more or less controlled politically— can yield vastly different results from country to country, depending on informal practices in the judicial system. Nevertheless, this concern applies to many EU states.
Now, the European Commission (EC) supports a set of instruments that are specifically designed to develop a three-pronged approach: prevent abuses, enforce compliance and promote a general culture of RoL. Amongst the newly proposed instruments, there is the EU Justice Scoreboard, and the inclusion of RoL monitorization in the European Semester process.
Before launching this new toolbox, the EC can look back to 2014, when a single version of the EU Anti-corruption Report was published analysing the situation in all Member States. It was supposed to be an annual exercise, but proved to be unsustainable from a political point of view as many Member States disliked it. Still, experts considered it a very useful instrument, as it highlighted both positive as well as negative elements in national practice and gave the opportunity for learning and building on the experience of others.
It is clear that the best way forward is a pan-European approach to RoL monitorization, but there are certain issues that have to be considered for this to take hold:
It remains to be seen whether and how the Conference on the Future of Europe, which the new Commission has announced, will help to address these issues.